Neverending edits

One of the challenges in the transition from college to grad school is accepting the fact that most of one’s papers will be co-written with an advisor, or possibly even team-written. Some advisors provide only high-level commentary, while others roll up their sleeves and get to work editing the draft. Either way, this typically means multiple drafts with track changes and comments.

This Ph.D. Comic by Jorge Cham sums up the problem nicely: Zeno’s Thesis’ Paradox

The back-and-forth can be a frustrating experience (for everyone involved!), but I would argue that it’s an important part of learning how to write an empirical paper.

If the type of feedback you’re getting from your advisor doesn’t work well for you, read this article about how to ask for what you need: The care and maintenance of your adviser


About Silvia Bunge

I'm a tenured faculty member, and the head graduate advisor in my department.
This entry was posted in Relationship with your advisor, Writing. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Neverending edits

  1. Silvia Bunge says:

    If you’re curious about Zeno and his paradoxes, read here – in particular “Achilles and the tortoise”:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s